Fibroids are common benign tumors of uterine origin that may
develop as variably sized solitary tumors or as aggregated clusters. They occur
predominantly in premenopausal women, and their growth appears to be hormone
(estradiol, progesterone) dependent. They may grow towards the uterine cavity
(submucous) or towards the abdominal cavity (subserosal), or they may be
located within the uterine wall (intramural).
Fibroids may be asymptomatic or
could be associated with a variety of complaints. Symptoms, such as
menometrorrhagia, pressure, urinary frequency, constipation, and pain, are
associated with size, number, and location of the fibroids.
Fibroids are very common – around one in two women will be affected at some point in their lives. However, most don't ever get any symptoms. You may have only one fibroid or you may have many fibroids of different sizes. Fibroids can range from being very small to around the size of a basketball.
Fibroids are named according to where they
are found in your womb.
·
Intramural fibroids grow within the muscular
wall of your womb.
·
Subserous fibroids grow from the outside wall
of your womb into your pelvic cavity. They can become very large.
·
Submucosal fibroids grow from the inner wall
of your womb into the space inside your womb.
·
Pedunculated fibroids grow from the outside
of your womb. These fibroids are almost free of the wall of your womb and are
only attached by a narrow stalk.
It has long been suspected that fibroids that distort the
uterine cavity are associated with infertility and miscarriages. The
association between fibroids and reproductive failure (infertility, pregnancy
loss) has been studied by several groups. The majority of these studies are
affected by the same problems: small sample size, no or inappropriate controls,
and a retrospective design. The use of a meta-analysis may remedy the
shortcomings of individual studies. In addition, few studies have addressed the
benefits of treatment in a well-designed manner. To further complicate the
issue, several treatment options -- medical, surgical, radiologic -- are
available, but their effects would need to be assessed separately.
This analysis is based on the results of 23 studies and is an
update of a previous review Fibroids in general, regardless of location, were
associated with a 15% reduction in pregnancy rates, a 30% reduction in live
birth rates, and a 67% increase in miscarriage rates when compared with
controls without fibroids. The effect was especially pronounced when submucous
fibroids were analyzed (64% reduction in pregnancy rates, 69% reduction in live
birth rates, and 67% increase in miscarriage rate). The effect of intramural
fibroids was significant but less pronounced (22% decrease in live birth rates,
89% increase in miscarriage rates). Subserous fibroids did not affect pregnancy
rates or pregnancy outcome. The analysis did not demonstrate a consistent
effect on pregnancy rates and outcomes.
Myomectomy was associated with improved pregnancy outcome when
submucosal myomas were evaluated. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher
after myomectomy when compared with women with fibroids left in place. On the
basis of a small number of cases, the removal of intramural fibroids was not
associated with improved pregnancy outcome.
Viewpoint
Although fibroids are one of the most common benign tumors that
affect reproductive-age women, studies are few and have been poorly designed to
assess their effect on reproduction. A cause-and-effect relationship seems
obvious between submucosal fibroids and reproductive failure. This association
is supported by this current review as well. In these cases, myomectomy does
improve outcome.
The association between intramural fibroids and lower
pregnancy rates seems to be supported as well, but the effect of treatment is
not obvious. In these cases, treatment needs to be individualized on the basis
of the outcome of previous pregnancies, the number of previous surgeries,
comorbidities, and the number and size of fibroids when treatment is offered.
In the future, studies will have to evaluate the benefits of treatment of
intramural myomas.
No comments:
Post a Comment